August 3, 2013
By: William Harless
RICHMOND, California - City officials in this San Francisco suburb passed an
ordinance this past week prohibiting city contractors from ever inquiring about
many job applicants' criminal histories.
The move in this city of 100,000 people, which is troubled by crime and
high unemployment, is part of a growing national trend that supporters say is
designed to improve the community's employment prospects amid wider
incarceration.
Under the ordinance, approved by the City Council in a 6-1 vote and set
to take effect in September, private companies that have city contracts and
that employ more than nine people won't be able to ask anything about an
applicant's criminal record; otherwise they would lose their city contracts.
The ordinance is one of the nation's strictest "ban-the-box" laws,
which are so called because many job applications contain a box to check if one
has a criminal record.
"Once we pay our debt, I think the playing field should be
fair," said Andres Abarra of Richmond, who was released from San Quentin
State Prison in 2006 after serving 16 months for selling heroin. Mr. Abarra, 60
years old, said he lost his first job out of prison, at a warehouse, about a
month after a temporary agency hired him. The agency ran a background check and
"let me go on the spot," he said. He now works for an advocacy group
called Safe Return that campaigned for the ordinance.
Others say the laws potentially endanger both employers and the public.
"We have a responsibility to protect our customers, protect other
employees and then the company itself" from potential crime, said Kelly Knott,
senior director for government relations of the National Retail Federation, an
industry group in Washington, D.C., which hasn't taken a position on
ban-the-box laws but has cautioned against federal guidance that could limit
how employers use background checks.
Richmond, with a population of about 100,000, joins 51 other
municipalities that have passed similar ordinances, many in the past five
years. Last year, Newark, N.J., barred private employers and the city
government from inquiring into a job applicant's criminal history until they
have made a conditional offer of employment, and employers can only take into
consideration certain offenses committed within the past five to eight years.
Murder, voluntary manslaughter and sex offenses requiring registry can be
inquired about no matter how much time has passed.
Ten states also have enacted ban-the-box legislation, according to the
National Employment Law Project, a nonprofit group that advocates for the laws.
Many of those laws don't apply to job applications for "sensitive"
positions, such as those involving work with children.
Michelle Rodriguez, a NELP staff attorney, said tougher sentencing laws
in recent decades, particularly for drug crimes, have sent more people to
prison, making post-incarceration unemployment a broader problem. "It
really could be anybody who has a criminal record now--your co-worker, your
neighbor," Ms. Rodriguez said. "And it doesn't mean they're a
criminal. It means they had a run-in with the law."
According to a report by the Sentencing Project, a group that promotes
changes in prison and sentencing policy, the U.S. prison population rose nearly
fivefold between 1980 and 2011.
Last year, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued
guidance that doesn't bar the use of criminal checks but that urges employers
to consider the crime, its relation to an applicant's potential job, and how
much time has passed since the conviction. In June, the EEOC sued two large
employers, alleging they used criminal background checks in ways that could
disproportionately affect African-Americans.
In 2010, one in every 12 black men aged 18-64 in the U.S. was
incarcerated, versus one in every 87 white men, according to a study by the Pew
Charitable Trusts, a public-policy nonprofit. Nearly 27% of the population in
Richmond is black, according to a 2012 U.S. Census estimate.
In Michigan, where a ban-the-box law has been proposed, the state's
Chamber of Commerce is concerned businesses could face liability lawsuits after
hiring ex-convicts if they end up hurting someone, said Wendy Block, a
spokeswoman. "We feel the [existing federal] provisions are sufficient in
terms of trying to prohibit job discrimination against former felons," Ms.
Block said.
In Richmond, which had an unemployment rate of 11.9% in June, according
to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the city's Chamber of Commerce didn't
take a position on the measure. But Chamber President and CEO Judith Morgan
said the city's businesses "understand the need here to put people back to
work and give people second chances." Ms. Morgan cautioned, however, that
it is "nebulous" how the city will enforce the measure.
The Richmond ordinance also makes exceptions for jobs the city deems
"sensitive," and it allows criminal background checks for positions,
like police-department and schoolteacher jobs, for which federal or state law
requires them.
Tamisha Walker, a 32-year-old college student who spent six months in prison for arson in 2009, campaigned for the new ordinance and said she hopes it can help Richmond be a place where people believe they can live successfully. She said a lot of people in Richmond want to "get out of Richmond and never come back. And it's sad, because we lose a lot of talent that way."
Copyright 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.